Strap in, kids: it’s gonna be another long one.
When, a while back, I recommended fellow Tennessean Gas Guy’s blog, I had no idea it was so near its last days. If you’ve taken my advice and followed up on it, you know that the Gas Guy has finished blogging (at least under that particular moniker) and has outed himself as another academic and (gasp!) not a Tennessean after all.
The interesting bit is that there is a raging debate in the comments thread over at his place, pretty evenly divided between those who simply enjoyed reading his stuff and are happy to say so versus those who (I think illogically) take umbrage at the idea that they were somehow duped by what they read. (I’d be lying if I said I didn’t suspect them of merely being pissed that he’s actually a Yankee, but that’s a post for another day.)
People are going so far as to say that “writing is about truth” and that they only read non-fiction “because there is no higher purpose of fiction than entertaining the reader in exchange for a paycheck.”
All thinking people know this is nothing but complete and total bollocks. Seriously. Cry me a fucking river, chumps; you fell for the illusion of a representative medium: language. While fiction asks us to suspend our disbelief, non-fiction–more insidiously–tacitly assumes we are unquestioningly credulous. Your precious non-fiction is, however, far from objective. I’ll refrain from referring you to scholarly sources, so just reflect on it a while: objectivity itself is an illusion. Two people would never tell the same story the same way (unless of course it’s a story they agreed to tell the same way for some nefarious purpose, but dude, Vincent D’Onofrio would suss that shit out and don’t tell me he wouldn’t, but you catch my drift: nefarious purposes!).
I have waxed on before about the lie of language and of representation, and we’re all familiar with the Magritte painting. Here’s the real problem, though: why and how has blogging become the new “objective” medium? The new journalism? Don’t bother telling me about how it has trumped the “real” journalists on specific stories lately; that’s not what I’m on about. I don’t read the political blogs unless they’re written by friends (and all both of those are on the sidebar, so have at it). I am more interested in the “personal” or “humor” blogs. I would never assume that in telling a joke (or writing one) a person is swearing to tell the truth, nor do I take the diary-type blogs at face value. Most of us don’t use our real names or include pictures of ourselves, and those who do are likewise not bound to any oath of honesty. That pink typewriter? Totally isn’t even mine.
While what I am discussing is more related to the human desire to arrange elements of a narrative in the most beneficial fashion (adding, deleting, embellishing, re-ordering, emphasizing or de-emphasizing, even manufacturing at will), there is another sort of elephant in the room when it comes to writing. Let’s face it people; there is a pretty decent chance that I don’t actually live in Zembla. For that matter, I might not even be a twenty-seven year old female. On the internet, odds are I am an overweight man with a predilection for teenagers.
Caveat fucking lector.
*Title cribbed from a work I enthusiastically recommend on this issue: Nietzsche’s “On Truth and Lie in an Extra-Moral Sense.” There, I’ve done it; I’ve gone and recommended Nietzsche to you. I’m so, so sorry. Please forget about this.
Latest Comments
RSS